Tag Archives: yeast

In Search of the Perfect Brewer’s Yeast or Nutritional Yeast

256px-S_cerevisiae_under_DIC_microscopyToday’s post will highlight concerns regarding brewer’s and nutritional yeast.  They have the potential to offer great benefits, but they have some booby traps that I think we should all know about.  Because the line of distinction between brewer’s yeast and nutritional yeast has been smudged and is no longer clear, I will refer to these products together simply as “supplemental yeasts.”  As always, a reminder that my blog and posts are stories of what I am learning, and they are not written for medical advice or treatment.

1.  Supplemental yeasts may be from genetically modified organisms (GMO) and/or may have been grown on GMO media. Yeasts can now be genetically modified, so it is possible that your supplemental yeast is a GMO.  Many supplement companies claim that their yeasts are GMO-free, and they may be.  After you verify the actual yeast is non-GMO, the next question on your radar will be, “Are the yeasts grown on GMO-free media?”  For example, both brewer’s and nutritional yeasts can be grown with molasses from sugar beets and sugar cane, two common GMOs.  (And if any grains were used, those can be GMOs too.)

2.  Supplemental yeasts may have synthetic vitamins added, particularly—but not only, vitamin B 12. Brewer’s yeast and nutritional yeast intrinsically have LOTS of vitamins and minerals, even if they are not fortified.  Most of the vitamins and minerals come naturally from nutrients the yeast incorporates from the growth media (grain, sugar beet, or sugar cane products), but sometimes supplement manufacturers add synthetic vitamins and minerals to enhance their product.  The enrichment process can occur during or after the yeast growth period.

It is expected that nutritional yeast contains vitamin B 12 because vegetarians and vegans often rely on it for their vitamin B 12 requirements (thus their “nutrition” as in “nutritional yeast”).  Some brewer’s yeast brands can contain vitamin B 12 too, while others do not.  Yeasts have no need for vitamin B 12, so it must be added to the product in some way.  Synthetic cyanocobalamin is typically added and not the preferred methylcobalamin, an actual physiologic form.  Why is this a concern?  Well, some people do not convert cyanocobalamin well to the needed methylcobalamin.

(Tip:  As an aside that doesn’t really fit elsewhere, light can damage vitamin B 12, so supplemental yeasts should probably not be in a clear bag for maximal vitamin B 12 activity. )

Vitamin B 12 aside, each yeast brand will vary slightly in which vitamins and minerals it contains and how much of each vitamin and mineral it contains.  Content and amounts will depend on what the yeast is grown on (beer, grains, sugar beets, or sugar cane products), if any extra vitamins and minerals were added to the “broth” the yeasts were grown in, and if any vitamins and minerals were added at the end of the process as fortification.  By enriching the “broth” of the growth media, the yeast can be coaxed to take up some vitamins and minerals it doesn’t normally use much of, so sometimes manufacturers add vitamins and minerals to the growth medium.  The vitamin and mineral content of supplemental yeasts can be further enhanced by adding desired vitamins and minerals after growth.  I’m not a mycologist (person who studies fungus), but I would assume that any vitamins and minerals present in the culturing broth would be assimilated into the yeast in physiologic forms.  For example, folic acid would be converted to a form of folate.  However, if the vitamins and minerals are added after culturing, then the forms will be whatever forms the manufacturer chooses, much like a multi-vitamin.  Make sense?

Important note:  Many supplemental yeast labels which are NOT fortified list “folic acid” as an ingredient.  However, if the yeast is indeed not fortified, then the supplement in fact should contain “folate.”  The representative for Swanson’s brewer’s yeast informed me that they are not required to differentiate between folic acid and folate on labels.  Bummer.

3.  Supplemental yeasts may contain gluten. Some brands declare they are gluten-free, but other brands do not make that statement.  Because these supplemental yeasts, whether brewer’s yeast or nutritional yeast, can be grown on grains, sugar cane molasses, and sugar beet molasses, it is important to verify gluten-free status if you need to be gluten-free.  When I called Swanson’s, the representative could not verify gluten-free status; even though most of their providers grow their yeasts on sugar beets, it was possible that the yeasts came from other sources.

4.  Supplemental yeasts contain glutamic acid (glutamate): All the supplemental yeasts (both brewer’s and nutritional yeast) have glutamic acid, an amino acid, in them because it is a part of the yeast cell’s proteins.  Upon processing, the glutamic acid may become “free glutamic acid,” similar to MSG (monosodium glutamate).  Free glutamic acid can act to stimulate neurons in the brain, and some people are either very sensitive to them and/or they don’t break the glutamic acid down well in their GI tracts.  (We actually have enzymes to deal with glutamic acid in our GI tracts, and we can break down a certain amount.  Some people, however, do not have either enough or good enough function of these enzymes.)  The glutamic acid then can lead to uncomfortable reactions like headaches, irritability, fatigue, and other reactions.

Some yeast products are heated to high temperatures during processing, and these temperatures can further increase free glutamic acid.  Some companies state that their products are not exposed to such high heat  (low heat processed), but I could not find a supplemental yeast that was not heated to at least pasteurize it.  (This does not seem like a raw food to me.)  Whether or not the free glutamic acid content is significant in supplemental yeasts seems to be up for debate.  Some people say that the glutamic acid in supplemental yeast is not free glutamic acid and therefore not problematic.  Others say it is free glutamic acid.  I couldn’t find a definitive source.  Of interest, many processed foods contain “autolyzed yeast” and “yeast extract” for flavor enhancement.  These often take the leftovers from true brewer’s yeast made on hops, break down the cell walls of the yeasts with enzyme, and use the peptides and cell wall constituents (including the now free glutamic acid) for flavoring.  These are basically equivalent to MSG.

5.  Supplemental yeasts can cause cross reactions in yeast and/or mold-sensitive people. Some people ask if these supplemental yeasts will make their Candida and yeast infections worse.  No.  They are inactive yeasts and cannot.  However, if people’s immune systems and gastrointestinal systems are very sensitive to yeasts, they may have a negative reaction!  It’s not that the yeast is growing in them, but due to a cross-reaction.  The body has learned to react to the yeast proteins (epitopes) in say, Candida albicans, and there will be yeast proteins in the supplement which can mirror Candida’s proteins.  Usually, if a person does poorly with something like kombucha (remember from an earlier post, it is just a strain of the same yeast), there’s a good chance they’ll do poorly with these yeast supplements.

6.  Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis Concerns: Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis patients have antibodies to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, particularly Crohn’s patients, so they should practice caution in trying supplements from these supplemental yeasts.

7.  Monoamine oxidase inhibitors and Demerol drug interaction: Patients on monoamine oxidase inhibitor drugs for depression (or other indications) and/or Demerol should avoid these yeasts.  Supplemental yeasts have high levels of the amino acid tyramine which can interact with monoamine oxidase inhibitor type medicines.

Closing:  Despite being the same type of yeast, each supplement is NOT the same!  Please know that you MUST treat each supplement, whether it is brewer’s yeast or nutritional yeast, on an individual basis.  And one supplemental yeast that is good for Tom will not be good for Joe.  No matter what anyone says.

Next post, I believe, will summarize the points in this post before I then move on to why people use these products and what I found to support or refute the touted benefits.

Sources to follow at end of the series.  There are a lot.  In the meantime, please, if you want to know a source—ask!  I don’t mind.  Questions, comments, and corrections welcomed.


Metametrix, Yeasts, and Candida

This post is a continuation of the exploration of my Metametrix 2100 GI Profile.

My Metametrix Test

My Metametrix test showed “+2 yeast/fungi; taxonomy unavailable.”  The fine print on the test paper states a couple of wpid-IMAG0963.jpgthings:

  • “A taxonomy unavailable finding may indicate ingested mold.  The higher the number, the greater the indication for treatment, particularly when accompanied by clinical symptoms.”
  • “Yeast overgrowth has been linked to many chronic conditions, in part because of antigenic responses in some patients to even low rates of yeast growth.  Potential symptoms include diarrhea, headache, bloating, atopic dermatitis and fatigue.  Positives are reported as +1, +2, +3, or +4…”

So no evidence on my test of the dreaded CANDIDA, and no absolute evidence of a need to treat for YEAST.  My “+2” test result could be related to anything I ate, such as a vinegar or my sauerkraut.  Or maybe not.


In my training, we learned that yeast was associated with specific conditions:  athlete’s foot, jock itch, diaper rash, thrush, vaginal infections, esophagitis, and overwhelming sepsis.  It was not a vague, nebulous condition affecting every organ system in the body.  A case of thrush did not mean a patient had a body riddled with Candida.  But this year as I’ve been reading about health on the internet, I have observed a lot of people very worried about  “Candida and yeast.”

Most of modern medicine scoffs at the loose use of “yeast” and “Candida” to describe a syndrome affecting the whole body.  Some of what makes the syndrome seem so hokey is the use of such wonderfully descriptive language, full of extremes, oversimplifications, and fear tactics:

  • “Invasion.”
  • “Is it breeding in you?”
  • “Do you have headaches, depression, anxiety, fatigue,  muscle aches, sore throats, sinusitis, cough, acne, acid reflux, athlete’s foot, vaginitis, bloating,  poor memory, irritability, allergies, asthma, and…and…and…and…”
  • “Starve them out.”
  • “Cleanse them out.”
  • “They burrow into your intestinal tract and can spread to every part of your body.”
  • “We all are infected.”

I prefer concrete, provable conditions supported by research.  If you bloat, there’s a good chance you have SIBO or FODMAP intolerance.  If you have a headache, you may need to eliminate nitrates from your diet.  Nice, supportable, proven conditions.  But what about otherwise healthy appearing individuals who despite doing all the right things, still feel bad?  Modern medicine is not helping them.  They’ve broached the multi-factorial approach and tried to remedy things:

  • food excesses (such as sugars of all types, grains, starches, preservatives, colors)
  • unknown food intolerances (such as eggs, nuts, dairy, wheat, coconut, soy)
  • “hard living” (lack of sleep, lack of daily movement, stress)
  • disruption of the typical bowel flora

What then is there to help them explain why they “just don’t feel good”?

Well, apparently all kinds of things–but today’s post is to provide links for “yeast” or “Candida” or “candidiasis” for those interested in further reading.  I’m not going to try to prove or disprove “Candida syndrome.”

Some Reads

Here are some articles I read that I appreciated for one reason or another.  I’d suggest, before you scoff at Candida or  conversely, dive headlong into eradicating it, that you read some of these.  After I read them, the “more you learn, the less you know” bells kept ringing in my head.  You decide for yourself.

I left off the Dr. Oz site.

1.  A very good, interesting review from European Journal of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, 2005.  Even though it discusses IBS (irritable bowel syndrome) in the title, it is a good read for anyone interested in yeast/Candida syndrome.  I appreciate that it was written by an MD and was published in a reputable journal.  It offers good background information and sources.

2. There are reports that some people MAY have polysomatic symptoms (numerous symptoms that seem diverse) due to yeast/Candida.  Their immune systems have inadvertently geared up to fight off yeasts/Candida, despite them being typical human commensal microbes.  The yeast apparently doesn’t even need to be “overgrown.”  The above mentioned article glosses on this, also.

Consider reading:  Candida/Yeast Hypersensitivity Syndrome and its citations, which both support and refute:

3.  Fascinatingly, overgrowth of yeast can lead to alcohol production in the body and “autointoxication.”  That’s weird.

4.  A very nice, well-rounded, and honest post, admitting strengths and weaknesses–from Mark’s Daily Apple:  A Primal Primer:  Candida.

5.  Another very nice well-rounded blog post:  Candida- Fact or Fiction by Jeff Chamberlain, MD

6.   The next link is to The Townsend Letter, The Examiner of Alternative Medicine, 2012.  I don’t know much about The Townsend Letter, but the article is written by an MD (et al), and it presents a lot of material with a good citation list to explore:  Candida,  Fungal-Type Dysbiosis, and Chronic Disease: Exploring the  Nature of the Yeast  Connection  (Stephen  Olmstead, MD; Dennis Meiss, PhD; and Janet Ralston, BS)


Following a GAPS/SCD/Paleo lifestyle for one year, I’ve managed to whittle down a bunch of “stupid” symptoms that have bothered me for years.  Headaches, constipation, and bloating still linger off and on.  I was doing great, but I jinxed myself at the one year mark with a glowing blog post.  Since then, headaches have been flaring.  Will check in with my medical doctor, and if they keep up…can anyone say, “+2 yeast”?

Related posts:

My Metametrix Experience

Another post on my Metametrix Experience

My Own Metametrix Report, First Page, With Thoughts

Metametrix, Pathogenic Bacteria Section