A story. A medical doctor has been coming to terms with the idea that she may have been brainwashed for years regarding diet, particularly dietary carbohydrates (and even more specifically the dietary reliance on grains). While she thought it was a benign misunderstanding, the intense undercurrent of hostility from the traditional believing experts in the medical community looms as threatening and leads her to wonder otherwise.
(Nothing on this blog or in this post should be construed as medical advice. It is only a story which may provide you with information to look up for yourself and discuss with your trusted healthcare professional.)
A conversation between a husband and wife, both physicians. Their diet deviates from the recommendations of both the American Diabetic Association and the American Heart Association.—
Her (beseechingly): I just don’t understand. We know diabetes is a carbohydrate processing problem. We know. More carbohydrate, more insulin. We know if we limit those patients’ carbs they might even get off their meds. We know.
Him: Well, that’s not standard of care. If you were practicing and put one of your patients on your d—
Her (defensively): It’s not MY diet.
Him: Well, anyhow, it’s not accepted. What if the guy died of a heart attack or something because of “your” diet (he always calls it “her” diet). You would be held accountable because it’s not standard of care. It’s not accepted. It’s not what we do.
Her: There are studies to support it.
Him: Doesn’t matter. That’s not what’s done. You’re pigeonholed.
Her: So I have to practice medicine according to some guidelines that were constructed, perhaps faultily, or else I’m liable–knowing that these diets are on to something and that I could help my diabetic patients?
Well, she didn’t want to believe him. How could medicine pigeonhole doctors that way? If studies and evidence support a low carbohydrate diet in some situations, why shouldn’t a well-informed physician manage patients that way? Why?
Why shouldn’t they? Because medical peers, so-called “experts” are issuing challenging, threatening words. Here it is. Just what “him” was talking about. Some Norwegian medical doctors want to block their peers from prescribing low carbohydrate, high fat diets. And they supply misleading, inaccurate information that does not appropriately reflect our current research knowledge. From a blog called Doc’s Opinion, a post called Taxing Animal Fats is Necessary–Still Chasing the Usual Suspects.:
“The message from the experts is clear: The fat diets are a threat to public health in Sweden…A question should be asked whether licensed physicians should be allowed to prescribe LCHF [low carbohydrate, high fat], which is not supported by scientific studies.”
BUT THESE NORWEGIAN “EXPERTS” ARE NOT MENTIONING IMPORTANT INFORMATION. Quickly searching, from the site Science News reporting on a Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine study, Losing Weight from either a Low-Carb or Low-Fat Diet Lowers Body Inflammation:
“Stewart [a professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine] adds that there’s still some bias in the medical community against a low-carb diet, which, by definition has a higher percentage of fat and protein than a low-fat diet. In their study, 60 people, ages 30 to 65, who were either overweight or obese with excessive fat around their waist, were randomly assigned to go on a low-fat or a low-carb diet for six months. Each group also participated in exercise training three times a week…The participants on the low-carb diet lost more weight, on average, than those on the low-fat diet — 28 pounds versus 18 pounds. The low-carb diet group also had a greater drop in BMI (4.7 versus 2.9), and a greater drop in belly fat (14.3 versus 8.4 pounds). The level of aerobic fitness increased in both groups by about 20 percent.”
And for you to read a list of more studies supporting low carbohydrate diets specifically in Type 2 diabetes, check out here from the site Diabetic Mediterranean Diet, European Guidelines Not In Favor of Low Carbohydrate Diets for Diabetes.
Back to conversation:
Her: Why are they fighting it so hard?
Him: YOU DON’T KNOW WHY? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? They don’t care about your HEALTH…
And then we headed into some very political discussions regarding green stuff, sustainability, the Earth’s bulging population, poverty, lack of education, and so forth…
Earnestly wishing you health and a sense of well-being, Terri